Rocket Scientist

Melding fiction and science in life and on paper

&
 

Mar 02 2009

More on the Big Picture

Published by stephanieebarr at 7:19 pm under Everything Else, philosophy Edit This

morguefile.com

Anyone else ever see the movie Creator with a 900 year old (but still charming) Peter O’Toole when he was teaching his graduate student 6 hours of “The Big Picture”?  Sometimes I think there are a number of people who could use a healthy dose of the big picture.  I mentioned yesterday that I would say what I thought about the Author’s Guild getting worked up over Amazon.com ’s used bookselling methods.  Admittedly this is nearly seven years ago so the concept is hardly topical and, in fact, I can no longer find the original position of the Author’s Guild directly.  I did find two sympathetic references here and here and one that disagreed (and also “printed” Amazon.com’s response).

So, after acknowledging this ship has sailed, let me tell you why I’m bringing it up again.  Inspired by yesterday’s “Kindle Swindle” reference, I got to thinking how people seem to have a hard time understanding the overall benefits of a situation because they are focusing on a teeny tiny aspect of it.  Like yesterday, getting outraged over having a book read something out loud without realizing they have the potential to be purchased and enjoyed by a whole spectrum of readers who might otherwise never be exposed, either because audio books are not available or because they are prohibitively expensive.  For no extra outlay, the author gets an audience they might not otherwise have had.

I felt the same way on the used book snitfit.  Now, I’m the sort of reader who, when I discover an author I really like, buys everything I can by that author.  Used bookstores are a boon, of course, but I love Amazon.com.  So far from dissuading me to read new books, falling well and truly in love with an author may mean I’m buying more and more new books.  AND I can collect my beloved but hard to find out of print books from my favorites (like Georgette Heyer, and such resources have provided me new and used hardbacks of over half her full complement of books).

But that’s only half of it.  Lots of people you think would know better are always working to their own detriment.  Banks that happily accepted a taxpayer handout are still foreclosing right and left, like this it’s to their benefit to sell a house for pennies on the dollar to a depressed market where no one is buying rather than trying to work with people who want to buy it, but are struggling.  How is that a smart move?  Or auto makers accepting billions to prevent an employee hemorrhage then rewarding that thinking with massive layoffs while still spending billions—on what exactly?  I mean, for a few billion dollars, couldn’t you have put on a good show at least?

There’s a line of reasoning that the only way to get ahead is to wring every tiny groat from the consumer until they’re limp and lifeless.  Great idea unless someone else with something better cheaper (like, say, Walmart) comes along or unless the consumer is no longer able to purchase anything.  Then what?

In biology, parasites that kill their hosts are generally considered failures.  Some of those screw-the-little-guy types might want to give that some thought.  Credit card companies are sending out notices (in our environment of lowest interest rates ever), doubling and tripling the interest rates because they know credit’s tight, not thinking that taking people for that extra bit now can readily backfire.

In the big picture, we all depend on one another and screwing over one group for the benefit of the other is short-sighted for a number of reasons, not the least of which is people won’t take it indefinitely.   Exacting a pound of flesh is a good way to run out of customers when a tiny bite here and there will improve their chances of survival and secure your own future.

I’m not advocating running out and holding everyone’s hand singing “Kumbaya” any more than I’d advocate everyone becoming an engineer.    I’m just saying not to get bogged down with trivialities, petty differences, little bits and pieces that, in the big picture, come out in the wash (aagh, there was apparently a sale on cliches!) or even make your own life a little brighter if you look with the right perspective.  If waiting two weeks gets you a happy customer and doesn’t mean your family starves, wait two weeks.  A little kindness and understanding, a little time in someone else’s shoes, a little breather here and there to watch a sunset - these are all good things.  A little less of “but-what-about-me” and a little more big picture might do us all a world of good.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Possibly-related Articles:                                        (auto-generated)

12 Responses to “More on the Big Picture”

  1. oldwestmomon 03 Mar 2009 at 12:36 pm edit this

    I don’t know about you, but unless the feng shui is perfectly in tune in my work environment, I am completely useless. I’m sure those big execs I slave for feel exactly the same way.

    You make so much sense. Rocket Scientist for president, 2012! Ok, or maybe 2016 if Obama manages to muddle through all this mess. But if we give another bailout package to AIG, I’m gonna puke. It would be nice to know what happened with the last round, and how they still managed to post such massive losses.

    Do you think it would be too passe’ for us to get our pitchforks and torches and rally around a mansion or two?

  2. flemisaon 03 Mar 2009 at 12:48 pm edit this

    I am so with you! Governments are handing out so much money but asking for so little in return. How about some accountability and personal responsibility before handing over so much? Some indication that they have a viable, sympathetic, effective and cost-effective plan would certainly help.

    As to having a view on things — I think too many have undervalued the individual humanity of others while focusing on the individual of ourself. The world view could certainly stand some adjustment.

    Back to the Kindle — it was hinted I might get one for my birthday so I am hoping. (My youngest granddaughter thinks it is so neat that I have a Nintendo and Ipod with more music on it than her mother has. Having a Kindle would certainly help my image I think.) And then maybe I’ll read some of the classics I’ve missed. Know I would probably get back to buying more books than depending on the youngest daughter to supply them.

  3. chameleonsdreamon 03 Mar 2009 at 5:07 pm edit this

    What a great metaphor - banks and big companies as parasites strangling their hosts. As far as AIG - I’m not an economist, but this is one place where it actually makes sense that they’re posting further losses BECAUSE they are doing what they’re supposed to be doing, which is paying out on losses posted by other banks and investment groups that they insured. AIG blew it bigtime by taking on far too much risky paper to insure…. but it makes more sense to oversee AIG backing up the bad paper when the investment groups file claims than it does to set up another organization to duplicate the function.

  4. shakespeareon 04 Mar 2009 at 9:23 am edit this

    I make no comment about banks (that world frightens me), but if people are so upset about used books, why don’t they get mad at libraries. After all, libraries buy one book and then lend it out to everybody. For FREE! What are they thinking?!?

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Some Today.com contributors may have received a fee or a promotional product or service from a manufacturer for promotional consideration, while others receive no consideration at all. Each contributor is responsible for disclosing any such promotional consideration.